Help
lexigame.com the home of unique word games

Lexigame Community
July 23, 2017, 10:48:31 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with email, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: A thought  (Read 1081 times)
2dognight
Neophyte
*
Posts: 41


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: July 16, 2017, 07:23:57 PM »


Thank you Pat will look for that in future

Mind you, the method Les uses does sound inviting

Logged
mjpanic
Neophyte
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2017, 06:02:19 PM »

Hello Alan W....love the concept of the game and appreciate and admire the work that you invest in it!
Overwhelmingly enthusiastic when I first found the site, my desire to connect is waning. My perception is that the game has a built in "unlevel" playing field!
I was encouraged to learn to spell, and, while I accept that the language (English, I assume, and variations of Trumpese) is "living", it's disappointing to find that it's being stabbed in the back by textian and scrabblish!! Thus it is that I see this unlevel field. I have to accept that lazy spelling is running riot, rare is common and vice versa, but it's anathema to me. 'Twould be nice if we could reverse the flow but that's for Sisyphus to contemplate?
Logged
Alan W
Administrator
Eulexic
*****
Posts: 3253


Melbourne, Australia


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2017, 09:56:37 PM »

Hi, mjpanic.

Do you have any examples of words that are contributing to this unlevel playing field?
Logged

Alan Walker
Creator of Lexigame websites
rogue_mother
Glossologian
**
Posts: 1452


Carbon-based life form


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 03:58:20 AM »

Only MJP can be certain to which words he or she was referring, but I would hazard a guess that one example might be sorta, which appeared in a puzzle recently, or its cousin gimme. He or she may also be objecting to fine old words such as orale, which are not widely known except to people who play Scrabble or crossword puzzles. He or she probably is frustrated, like many other Chihuahua players, by the fact that words common to him or her such as rota or rort are not considered common in Chihuahua. Perhaps as purist he or she believes that the English language began its decay in 1828, when Mr. Webster first published his dictionary. Perhaps he or she objects to any word added to the English language after Samuel Johnson published his dictionary in 1755. In any case MJP's reference to "Trumpese" is gratuitous, since any word in the Chihuahua lexicon to which he or she probably objects has been there since before Mr. Trump became a candidate in the American presidential election process.

In some sense the playing field is unlevel for everyone, because everyone has differing levels of education, differing regional vocabularies and differing methods and expectations while playing the game.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:27:55 AM by rogue_mother » Logged

Inside the Beltway, Washington, DC metropolitan area
Calilasseia
Lexicomane
***
Posts: 121


Pass the dissection kit ...


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 05:18:54 PM »

Of course, part of the problem is that the game caters to an international audience, as it were, and that audience includes populations of several million apiece in places such as Australia and New Zealand, which all have their own unique additions to the language. Many of said additions being commonplace in speech in those countries, but which are almost certainly unheard of beyond those shores. Likewise, I suspect South Africa has some interesting additions of its own that constitute, shall we say, limited exports. Players in these countries probably encounter the "not found" message rather more frequently than they would like as a result.

Then, of course, we have the large body of antique words, originating from English as spoken 200 or more years ago, that are, today, mainly the province of professional lexicographers and Scrabble players.

One issue I keep encountering, is the number of words that are commonplace in scientific papers (which I have dealings with on a regular basis), but which are in some cases missing from the Chi database. Likewise, a number of terms from the world of pure mathematics, with which I am familiar, are similarly conspicuous by their absence, though I suspect the number of graduate or professional mathematicians here who would lament their absence is extremely small. However, a good number of terms from that field are too long to appear in the database, which stops at 10 letter words, so such gems as 'homeomorphism' won't appear for that reason. (For those who want to delve into the intricacies of the difference between 'homomorphism' and 'homeomorphism', Wikipedia's entries on these terms should prove entertaining!). In addition, several terms from both mathematics and the hard sciences are ruled out on the basis of being proper nouns, either intrinsically or by virtue of arising from the name of an eminent worker in the field. Topology is particularly replete with these, with various entities within that discipline being named after the mathematicians who first worked upon them - spaces that are labelled Hausdorff, Tychonoff and Kolmogorov being merely three of many, with those labels being associated in each case by a precise definition of the nature of the space. Those who wish to delve further on this matter may either find themselves wonderfully entertained, or completely bemused, depending upon background.

Then of course, we have that region of hilarity, arising from the manner in which American English changes the spellings of words with respect to British English, merely one of many reasons for the old joke about Americans and British people being divided by a common language.

Enabling the Chi game to please everybody all of the time, via, for example, such devices as taking regional variations into account, would not only expand the database by a large amount, but require the underlying software to become a labyrinthine behemoth, which is one of the reasons Alan hasn't gone down this road - if he were paid to perform this undertaking, he would be able to retire handsomely on the proceeds!
Logged

Remember: if the world's bees disappear, we become extinct with them ...
TRex
Glossologian
**
Posts: 1231


~50 miles from Chicago, in the Corn (maize) Belt


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: Today at 01:29:24 AM »

Then, of course, we have the large body of antique words, originating from English as spoken 200 or more years ago, that are, today, mainly the province of professional lexicographers and Scrabble players.

Interestingly (to me, at any rate), is that today's 'Word of the Day' from the OED is widge, the letters of which are available in the current Challenge puzzle. But the word, which is quite old [A horse, a steed; (in later use spec.) a mare. Also: an ass.], was not playable ('not found').


One issue I keep encountering, is the number of words that are commonplace in scientific papers (which I have dealings with on a regular basis), but which are in some cases missing from the Chi database.

And yet others have noted (and I agree) the Chi database seems to have a tendency to treat scientific terms as common.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 20 queries.